People v. Taylor

2020 NY Slip Op 1023, 180 A.D.3d 502, 115 N.Y.S.3d 874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 A.D.3d 86
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 2020·No. 11025 7870/98·Published

Opinion

People v Taylor (2020 NY Slip Op 01023)
People v Taylor
2020 NY Slip Op 01023
Decided on February 13, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 13, 2020
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

11025 7870/98

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Keith Taylor, Defendant-Appellant.


Feldman & Feldman, Uniondale (Arza Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Vincent Rivellese of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered May 19, 2017,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 13, 2020

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 2020 NY Slip Op 1023, 180 A.D.3d 502, 115 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 1023 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431