People v. Taylor

2020 NY Slip Op 308, 179 A.D.3d 845, 113 N.Y.S.3d 899
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 2020
DocketInd. No. 17-00533
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 308 (People v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Taylor, 2020 NY Slip Op 308, 179 A.D.3d 845, 113 N.Y.S.3d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Taylor (2020 NY Slip Op 00308)
People v Taylor
2020 NY Slip Op 00308
Decided on January 15, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 15, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ROBERT J. MILLER
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-07709
(Ind. No. 17-00533)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Lloyd Taylor, appellant.


Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered May 10, 2018, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant validly waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution (see People v Griffin, 167 AD3d 934). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal also precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256). Further, since the defendant does not claim that his plea was rendered involuntary as a result of counsel's alleged ineffectiveness, his contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is also barred by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Brown, 117 AD3d 962; People v Mejia, 112 AD3d 855; People v Dunne, 106 AD3d 928, 928-929).

DILLON, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Dunne
106 A.D.3d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Mejia
112 A.D.3d 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Brown
117 A.D.3d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 308, 179 A.D.3d 845, 113 N.Y.S.3d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-taylor-nyappdiv-2020.