People v. Taylor

2016 NY Slip Op 8449, 145 A.D.3d 555, 41 N.Y.S.3d 894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 1044
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 2016·No. 2479 1162/13·Published

Opinion

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered October 29, 2013, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing her to a conditional discharge for a period of three years, held in abeyance, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for a Huntley hearing.

As the People concede, defendant’s allegation that her statements to an investigator were involuntarily made was sufficient to require a hearing on her motion to suppress those statements (see CPL 710.60 [3] [b]). However, to the extent defendant characterizes the relief she requests as a “Dunaway/ Huntley” hearing, we find that her factual allegations were insufficient to raise any Fourth Amendment issue.

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 2016 NY Slip Op 8449, 145 A.D.3d 555, 41 N.Y.S.3d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8449 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.