People v. Taylor

137 A.D.3d 1099, 26 N.Y.S.3d 882
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 2016·No. 2013-05598·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), dated April 25, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s application for a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]). The defendant failed to demonstrate the existence of a mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the SORA Guidelines that warranted a downward departure from his presumptive risk level designation (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]; People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Nowicki, 133 AD3d 732, 732-733 [2015]; People v Shelton, 126 AD3d 959, 960 [2015]).

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Dickerson and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 137 A.D.3d 1099, 26 N.Y.S.3d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

137 A.D.3d 1099 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Soto
2020 NY Slip Op 3930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)