People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Taylor

70 A.D.3d 1066, 892 N.Y.S.2d 919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 1066 (People v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Taylor, 70 A.D.3d 1066, 892 N.Y.S.2d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J), rendered January 23, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to six months in jail and 10 years of probation. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J), rendered January 23, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to six months in jail and 10 years of probation. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.3d 1066, 892 N.Y.S.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-taylor-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack