People v. Taylor

43 A.D.3d 1400, 842 N.Y.S.2d 660
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered September 3, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [1]), defendant contends that County Court erred in determining, following a Darden hearing, that a confidential informant existed or that he or she provided law enforcement with the information set forth in the search warrant. Because defendant pleaded guilty before the court issued a suppression ruling with respect [1401]*1401to the evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant, he waived his right to raise the suppression issue on appeal (see generally People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686, 688 [1986]; People v Carrasco, 216 AD2d 908 [1995], Iv denied 86 NY2d 791 [1995]; People v Stewart, 104 AD2d 734 [1984]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Gorski, Centra, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 43 A.D.3d 1400, 842 N.Y.S.2d 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

43 A.D.3d 1400 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Butler
2017 NY Slip Op 6753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
BADDING, JR., ROBERT E., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Badding
107 A.D.3d 1453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)