People v. Taylor

253 A.D.2d 666, 677 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9622
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 A.D.2d 945

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.), rendered October 29, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The totality of the evidence regarding the chain of custody of the drugs in question provided assurances of the identity and unchanged condition of the evidence (see, People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340). The court properly exercised its discretion in limiting defendant’s cross-examination of the undercover officer regarding a totally unrelated drug transaction, which had no bearing on the officer’s ability to identify this defendant and which would have served only to distract the jury from the relevant issues (see, People v Alston, 215 AD2d 108, 109, lv denied 86 NY2d 732). Defendant has failed to preserve his challenges to the prosecutor’s cross-examination and summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find them to be without merit. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 253 A.D.2d 666, 677 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 666 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Alston
215 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)