People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

People v. Taylor

36 Cal. App. 762

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 12, 1918

DocketCrim. No. 416

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cal. App. 762 (People v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Taylor, 36 Cal. App. 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property. His appeal was regularly taken but it has not been prosecuted. No argument has been made in his behalf in this court, and, therefore, our attention has not been called to any ground for interfering with the judgment of the lower court. The presumptions are, of course, in favor of the regularity of the proceedings in the court below. Moreover, an examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence to justify the verdict without prejudicial error being shown therein. (People v. Wagner, ante, p. 41, [171 Pac. 699].)

The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property. His appeal was regularly taken but it has not been prosecuted. No argument has been made in his behalf in this court, and, therefore, our attention has not been called to any ground for interfering with the judgment of the lower court. The presumptions are, of course, in favor of the regularity of the proceedings in the court below. Moreover, an examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence to justify the verdict without prejudicial error being shown therein. (People v. Wagner, ante, p. 41, [171 Pac. 699].)

The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cal. App. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-taylor-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack