People v. Taylor CA3

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 3, 2023
DocketC097732
StatusUnpublished

This text of People v. Taylor CA3 (People v. Taylor CA3) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Taylor CA3, (Cal. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Filed 8/3/23 P. v. Taylor CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C097732

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 10F02912)

v.

KALIEF TAYLOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Kalief Taylor appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Appointed counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 or People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and asking us to exercise our discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal. We shall dismiss the appeal as abandoned.

1 DISCUSSION On May 15, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an order denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Delgadillo, defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant if we did not receive a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.) DISPOSITION The appeal is dismissed.

/s/ Duarte, J.

We concur:

/s/ Earl, P.J.

/s/ Horst, J.

 Judge of the Placer County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wende
600 P.2d 1071 (California Supreme Court, 1979)
People v. Delgadillo
521 P.3d 360 (California Supreme Court, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Taylor CA3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-taylor-ca3-calctapp-2023.