People v. Tayeh

2020 NY Slip Op 1649, 181 A.D.3d 726, 117 N.Y.S.3d 606
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2020·No. 2016-05126·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

People v Tayeh (2020 NY Slip Op 01649)
People v Tayeh
2020 NY Slip Op 01649
Decided on March 11, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 11, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2016-05126
(Ind. No. 2001/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Modraan Tayeh, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Erica Horwitz of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Kathleen Halliday on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Deborah Stevens Modica, J.), imposed April 28, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the record does not reflect that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257). The Supreme Court's colloquy did not ensure that the defendant understood the distinction between the right to appeal and the other trial rights which are forfeited incident to a plea of guilty (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257; People v Portillo, 178 AD3d 860; People v Batista, 167 AD3d 69, 76). Also, the court's colloquy and written waiver improperly mischaracterized the appellate rights waived as encompassing an absolute bar to the taking of a direct appeal and the loss of attendant rights to counsel and poor person relief, and also all postconviction relief separate from the direct appeal (see People v Thomas, __NY3d__, 2019 NY Slip Op 08545 *8 [2019]).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tayeh, 2020 NY Slip Op 1649, 181 A.D.3d 726, 117 N.Y.S.3d 606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 1649 (People v. Tayeh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Matthew M.
2024 NY Slip Op 01023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Francis
185 N.Y.S.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Hope
2021 NY Slip Op 01787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Pellew
2020 NY Slip Op 05939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Morocho
2020 NY Slip Op 3542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)