People v. Taveras

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Taveras

169 A.D.2d 743

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered July 12, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find no improvident exercise of discretion in the court’s denial, without a hearing, of the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926). We therefore affirm the judgment. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered July 12, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find no improvident exercise of discretion in the court’s denial, without a hearing, of the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926). We therefore affirm the judgment. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

People v. Taveras, 169 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

169 A.D.2d 743 (People v. Taveras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related