People v. Tavarez

235 A.D.2d 278, 652 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 261
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered May 20, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of [279] two counts of robbery in the first degree and one count of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 15 years, 5 to 15 years and 1 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that his sentence should be reduced or he should be resentenced because the presentence report before the court allegedly contained inaccurate and prejudicial statements is unpreserved. It is also without merit since there is no evidence that the court relied on the allegedly inaccurate information when it sentenced defendant precisely as promised.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tavarez, 235 A.D.2d 278, 652 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 278 (People v. Tavarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MCNAMARA, DAVID F., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. McNamara
103 A.D.3d 1273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Sumpter
286 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Vasquez
256 A.D.2d 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)