People v. Tatum
This text of 35 A.D.3d 511 (People v. Tatum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 12, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
After conducting a Geraci/Sirois hearing (see People v Geraci, 85 NY2d 359 [1995]; Matter of Holtzman v Hellenbrand, 92 AD2d 405 [1983]), the trial court correctly determined that a previously cooperative eyewitness had been rendered unavailable due to threats made by the defendant’s brother, at the defendant’s initiative or acquiescence (see People v Cotto, 92 NY2d 68 [1998]; People v Geraci, supra).
Moreover, the court correctly declined the defendant’s request to submit manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included [512]*512offense of intentional murder (see People v Seabrooks, 27 AD3d 494 [2006]; People v Moreno, 16 AD3d 438 [2005]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 A.D.3d 511, 824 N.Y.S.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tatum-nyappdiv-2006.