People v. Tate

115 A.D.3d 887, 982 N.Y.S.2d 345

This text of 115 A.D.3d 887 (People v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tate, 115 A.D.3d 887, 982 N.Y.S.2d 345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered March 18, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain alleged prosecutorial misconduct on summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Faustin, 35 AD3d 499 [2006]), and, in any event, without merit.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Rivera, J.E, Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Faustin
35 A.D.3d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D.3d 887, 982 N.Y.S.2d 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tate-nyappdiv-2014.