People v. Tate
This text of 296 A.D.2d 511 (People v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered October 18, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. o
[512]*512Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 A.D.2d 511, 745 N.Y.S.2d 476, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tate-nyappdiv-2002.