Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Tassiello

People v. Tassiello

275 A.D.2d 653
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 653 (People v. Tassiello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tassiello, 275 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

It would seem preferable practice not to include statements of the present nature in a record on appeal. Such statement will be submitted to this court on the argument of the main appeal. At that time we can determine whether, in the interests of justice, we should reveal the contents of the statement to counsel for defendant. The order appealed from should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. . Priori
57 N.E. 85 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
People v. Walsh
186 N.E. 422 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
People v. Miller
177 N.E. 306 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme Court
156 N.E. 84 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
People v. M'Vey
66 A.D. 78 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tassiello-nyappdiv-1949.