People v. Tartt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tartt

55 A.D.2d 1006, 391 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10332

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 1006 (People v. Tartt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tartt, 55 A.D.2d 1006, 391 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: The People candidly concede that the sentence upon Count No. 8 of the indictment was error. In that count, appellant was charged with possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, but the court mistakenly sentenced him as a felon. The sentence should be modified to a definite term of one year (see [1007]*1007People v Dixon, 52 AD2d 1090). We have examined appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court — criminal possession dangerous drug, first degree and other charges.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: The People candidly concede that the sentence upon Count No. 8 of the indictment was error. In that count, appellant was charged with possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, but the court mistakenly sentenced him as a felon. The sentence should be modified to a definite term of one year (see [1007]*1007People v Dixon, 52 AD2d 1090). We have examined appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court — criminal possession dangerous drug, first degree and other charges.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 1006, 391 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tartt-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack