Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Tartaglia

People v. Tartaglia

324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 918, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1079
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 324 N.E.2d 368 (People v. Tartaglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tartaglia, 324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 918, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1079 (N.Y. 1974).

Opinion

Memorandum. We conclude that in the unusual circumstances disclosed in this record defendant was denied a fair trial as a matter of law. Accordingly the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted for a new trial.

An earlier motion that the Trial Judge disqualify himself because as a former District Attorney he had prosecuted this defendant for a prior offense, was renewed at the opening of the trial, and again denied. Thereafter in the course of the trial the Trial Judge, concluding that there might have been deficiencies in a pretrial suppression hearing conducted by another Judge who had denied suppression, arrogated to himself authority to remedy such perceived deficiencies and conducted what amounted to a supplemental suppression hearing. In so doing the court summarily rejected defense counsel’s cogent request that such a hearing, if any, be conducted out of the presence of the jury; as a result defendant was significantly handicapped in his participation in the hearing. Additionally the Judge injected himself into the trial and indulged in excessive questioning and unnecessary altercations with defense counsel.

While we cannot say that the Trial Judge’s failure to recuse himself was improper as a matter of law, nor indeed that any other conduct of the Trial Judge was by itself an error of law, [920]*920we are satisfied, when all are taken together, that defendant was deprived of his right to a fair trial.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin and Stevens concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Glynn
999 N.E.2d 1137 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Curkendall
12 A.D.3d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Tiffany
176 Misc. 2d 271 (New York County Courts, 1998)
People v. Rosato
193 A.D.2d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Hall v. Castillo
174 A.D.2d 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Jones
143 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Rosario v. Scully
679 F. Supp. 384 (S.D. New York, 1988)
People v. Moreno
516 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Peterson
126 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Felipe Garcia v. Warden, Dannemora Correctional Facility
795 F.2d 5 (Second Circuit, 1986)
People v. Harris
117 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
William Daye v. Attorney General of the State of New York and Eugene S. Lefevre, Superintendent Clinton Correctional Facility
712 F.2d 1566 (Second Circuit, 1983)
People v. McKutchen
76 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Ellis
62 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Smith
59 A.D.2d 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People v. Carter
358 N.E.2d 517 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 918, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tartaglia-ny-1974.