People v. Tarpey
This text of 59 Cal. 371 (People v. Tarpey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The information charges that the crime of robbery was committed by the defendant at the City and County of San Francisco, to which the defendant pleaded “Hot guilty.” There is no evidence that the defendant did commit that crime at said city and county. It is not stated in the evidence where the crime was committed. This is a sufficient ground for reversing the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial. (People v. Fisher, 51 Cal. 319.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cal. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tarpey-cal-1881.