People v. Taro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Taro

107 A.D.3d 1468, 967 N.Y.S.2d 862

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Taro. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.3d 1371 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 2013·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), rendered January 24, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), rendered January 24, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.

People v. Taro, 107 A.D.3d 1468, 967 N.Y.S.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

107 A.D.3d 1468 (People v. Taro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.