People v. Tarnovska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tarnovska

130 A.D.2d 784, 515 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 784 (People v. Tarnovska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tarnovska, 130 A.D.2d 784, 515 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bourgeois, J.), rendered April 14, 1983, as amended April 22, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and kidnapping in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and the arguments raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief, filed pursuant to leave granted by this court, and find them to be without merit. We agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). [785]*785Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bourgeois, J.), rendered April 14, 1983, as amended April 22, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and kidnapping in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and the arguments raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief, filed pursuant to leave granted by this court, and find them to be without merit. We agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). [785]*785Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 784, 515 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tarnovska-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack