People v. Tarka
This text of 556 N.E.2d 1073 (People v. Tarka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*997 OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed, the judgment of conviction vacated and the information dismissed.
To be facially sufficient, an information must contain allegations of every element of the offense charged and the defendant’s commission thereof (CPL 100.40 [1] [c]; 100.15 [3]). Inasmuch as the information charging defendant with disorderly conduct fails to allege the essential element of either intent or recklessness (see, Penal Law §240.20 [3]), as the People concede, the information is jurisdictionally defective and must be dismissed (see, People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133, 135-136; People v Hall, 48 NY2d 927, 928).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.40), order reversed, etc .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 N.E.2d 1073, 75 N.Y.2d 996, 557 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tarka-ny-1990.