People v. Tarangelo
307 N.E.2d 48, 33 N.Y.2d 839, 351 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 880
Opinion
Order affirmed in the following memorandum: Although we believe the letter was improperly used, the error committed by the trial court in permitting this use was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant reversal.
Concur: Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Tarangelo, 307 N.E.2d 48, 33 N.Y.2d 839, 351 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 880 (N.Y. 1973).
307 N.E.2d 48 (People v. Tarangelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cardew v. Gialanella
92 A.D.3d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)