Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Tankson

People v. Tankson

207 A.D.2d 365, 616 N.Y.S.2d 199
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 1, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 365 (People v. Tankson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tankson, 207 A.D.2d 365, 616 N.Y.S.2d 199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), imposed January 4,1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of her right to appeal her sentence was not valid (see, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283). We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, O’Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 A.D.2d 365, 616 N.Y.S.2d 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tankson-nyappdiv-1994.