People v. Tankleff
This text of 719 N.E.2d 916 (People v. Tankleff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the Court’s own motion, a dispensation of this Court’s Rules of Practice for the timely making of a reargument motion is granted (see, 22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). On the motion for reargument, the matter having been given due and full consideration, the motion is denied on the ground that the Court of Appeals did not overlook or misapprehend any relevant material or legal issue (see, 22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [1]) with respect to the subject now reiterated on this Court’s decision on the direct appeal of this case (84 NY2d 992 [1994]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 N.E.2d 916, 93 N.Y.2d 1034, 697 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tankleff-ny-1999.