People v. Tankleff

719 N.E.2d 916, 93 N.Y.2d 1034, 697 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2938
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 14, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 N.E.2d 916 (People v. Tankleff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tankleff, 719 N.E.2d 916, 93 N.Y.2d 1034, 697 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2938 (N.Y. 1999).

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, a dispensation of this Court’s Rules of Practice for the timely making of a reargument motion is granted (see, 22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). On the motion for reargument, the matter having been given due and full consideration, the motion is denied on the ground that the Court of Appeals did not overlook or misapprehend any relevant material or legal issue (see, 22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [1]) with respect to the subject now reiterated on this Court’s decision on the direct appeal of this case (84 NY2d 992 [1994]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Tankleff
49 A.D.3d 160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 N.E.2d 916, 93 N.Y.2d 1034, 697 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tankleff-ny-1999.