People v. Tammie J.

California Court of Appeal

People v. Tammie J.

101 Cal. App. 3d 24, 161 Cal. Rptr. 286, 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1372

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 14, 1980

DocketCrim. 35019

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 Cal. App. 3d 24 (People v. Tammie J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tammie J., 101 Cal. App. 3d 24, 161 Cal. Rptr. 286, 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1372 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

The minor appeals from an order finding her to be a person coming under section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and ordering her suitably placed. We reverse.

The minor was charged with burglary—a violation of section 459 of the Penal Code. After a hearing, she was found not guilty of burglary but guilty of tresspass as defined in subdivision (j) of section 602 of the Penal Code. This case is on all fours with In re Carlo S. (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 377 [156 Cal.Rptr. 442]. In that case a minor was charged with assault under section 245 of the Penal Code; he was found guilty of a violation of section 148 of that code—a nonincluded and uncharged offense. The minor had stood silent when the ruling was announced. The appellate court reversed. Here the offense of which the minor was found guilty—subdivision (j) of section 602 of the Penal Code—is not an included offense within a charge of burglary. (People *26 v. Harris (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 754 [12 Cal.Rptr. 916].) The same result will follow.

The order is reversed.

Files, P. J., and Swearinger, J., * concurred.

*

Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

The minor appeals from an order finding her to be a person coming under section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and ordering her suitably placed. We reverse.

The minor was charged with burglary—a violation of section 459 of the Penal Code. After a hearing, she was found not guilty of burglary but guilty of tresspass as defined in subdivision (j) of section 602 of the Penal Code. This case is on all fours with In re Carlo S. (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 377 [156 Cal.Rptr. 442]. In that case a minor was charged with assault under section 245 of the Penal Code; he was found guilty of a violation of section 148 of that code—a nonincluded and uncharged offense. The minor had stood silent when the ruling was announced. The appellate court reversed. Here the offense of which the minor was found guilty—subdivision (j) of section 602 of the Penal Code—is not an included offense within a charge of burglary. (People *26 v. Harris (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 754 [12 Cal.Rptr. 916].) The same result will follow.

The order is reversed.

Files, P. J., and Swearinger, J., * concurred.

*

Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 Cal. App. 3d 24, 161 Cal. Rptr. 286, 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tammie-j-calctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack