People v. Talutis

39 A.D.2d 815, 332 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4490
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 815 (People v. Talutis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Talutis, 39 A.D.2d 815, 332 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Tompkins County, entered December 8, 1971, which granted a motion by defendant to suppress evidence. A housekeeper, while supervising the cleaning of respondent’s rooms, observed two plastic bowl-shaped containers and cigarette papers in a bureau drawer. She opened one of the. containers and found in it a greenish, leafy, vegetable-like substance together\vith seed-like material. It had a peculiar odor, and the leafy material resembled pictures of marijuana which she had observed on posters. She, therefore, concluded that the substance she had found was marijuana. The County Court, concluding that there was probable cause for believing that respondent was in possession of dangerous drugs, issued a search warrant. The search was made and marijuana was seized. Respondent thereafter moved to suppress the marijuana, which motion was summarily granted. The order must be reversed. Probable cause for a search exists when there is reasonable ground of suspicion supported by facts and circumstances strong enough in themselves to warrant a cautious man in the belief that the law is being violated on the premises to be searched ” (People v. Marshall, 13 N Y 2d 28, 34; see People v. Rodger, 28 A D 2d 625). The affiant had sufficient knowledge to identify marijuana for the purpose of establishing probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant (cf. People v. Kenny, 30 N Y 2d 154). Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and motion denied. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Sweeney and Simons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harvin
126 Misc. 2d 775 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.2d 815, 332 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-talutis-nyappdiv-1972.