People v. Talley

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Talley

171 N.W.2d 53, 18 Mich. App. 240, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1051

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 1969·No. Docket No. 5,801·Published

Opinion

J. H. Gillis, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of armed robbery MOLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1969 Hum Supp § 28.797) in a jury trial. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error in its charge to the jury and, further, that the trial court denied the defendant a fair trial by displaying its feeling of defendant’s guilt to the jury and, finally, the defendant alleges that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal.

An examination of the record fails to establish any of the defendant’s claims of reversible error.

Affirmed.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. H. Gillis, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of armed robbery MOLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1969 Hum Supp § 28.797) in a jury trial. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error in its charge to the jury and, further, that the trial court denied the defendant a fair trial by displaying its feeling of defendant’s guilt to the jury and, finally, the defendant alleges that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal.

An examination of the record fails to establish any of the defendant’s claims of reversible error.

Affirmed.

All concurred.

People v. Talley, 171 N.W.2d 53, 18 Mich. App. 240, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1051 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

171 N.W.2d 53 (People v. Talley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.