People v. Tall

2020 NY Slip Op 05866, 130 N.Y.S.3d 688, 187 A.D.3d 586
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 20, 2020
DocketDocket No. 060766/14N Appeal No. 12127 Case No. 2017-2023
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05866 (People v. Tall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tall, 2020 NY Slip Op 05866, 130 N.Y.S.3d 688, 187 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Tall (2020 NY Slip Op 05866)
People v Tall
2020 NY Slip Op 05866
Decided on October 20, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 20, 2020
Before: Acosta, P.J., Mazzarelli, Moulton, González, JJ.

Docket No. 060766/14N Appeal No. 12127 Case No. 2017-2023

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Oumar Tall, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ronald Alfano of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered June 12, 2015, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of harassment in the second degree, and sentencing him to a conditional discharge for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348—349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning identification and credibility. The victim took a photograph

of defendant immediately after the attack, which clearly corroborates the victim's testimony, and we reject defendant's arguments to the contrary.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 20, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 05866, 130 N.Y.S.3d 688, 187 A.D.3d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tall-nyappdiv-2020.