People v. Taliaferro
This text of 27 A.D.3d 495 (People v. Taliaferro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J), rendered September 9, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this direct appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 637 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.3d 495, 810 N.Y.S.2d 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-taliaferro-nyappdiv-2006.