People v. Taggart
234 N.E.2d 714, 21 N.Y.2d 729, 287 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1684
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, the court necessarily determined that the search of defendant’s person, under common law or as authorized by section 180-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure, did not violate the Fourth or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. [See 20 N Y 2d 335.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Taggart, 234 N.E.2d 714, 21 N.Y.2d 729, 287 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1684 (N.Y. 1968).
234 N.E.2d 714 (People v. Taggart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Rance
227 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Cartagena
189 A.D.2d 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Commonwealth v. Hurd
557 N.E.2d 72 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1990)
Commonwealth v. McCauley
419 N.E.2d 1072 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)