People v. Taebel

138 A.D.3d 606, 28 N.Y.S.3d 863
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 2016·No. 920 2536/12·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Sonberg, J.), rendered May 10, 2013, as amended May 15, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of six months, with five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence refuted defendant’s justification defense, and established his intent to cause serious physical injury.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s pro se arguments.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taebel, 138 A.D.3d 606, 28 N.Y.S.3d 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 606 (People v. Taebel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)