People v. Szeliga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Szeliga

186 A.D.2d 1042, 590 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11629

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 1042 (People v. Szeliga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Szeliga, 186 A.D.2d 1042, 590 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court correctly concluded that the questioning of defendant by Investigator Clark was noncustodial and that defendant’s statement was voluntary (see, People v Centano, 76 NY2d 837, 838). Thus, defendant’s statement was properly admitted at trial. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Leaving Scene of Accident.) Present — -Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court correctly concluded that the questioning of defendant by Investigator Clark was noncustodial and that defendant’s statement was voluntary (see, People v Centano, 76 NY2d 837, 838). Thus, defendant’s statement was properly admitted at trial. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Leaving Scene of Accident.) Present — -Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 1042, 590 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-szeliga-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack