People v. Szadek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Szadek

143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10710

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1988·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, as we must, in a manner most favorable to the prosecution and granting all reasonable inferences in the People’s favor (People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict that defendant recklessly caused serious physical injury to the victim by shooting him with a deadly weapon (see, Penal Law § 120.05 [4]; People v Wright, 105 AD2d 1088). We have considered defendant’s remaining claims and find each one lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — assault, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence, as we must, in a manner most favorable to the prosecution and granting all reasonable inferences in the People’s favor (People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict that defendant recklessly caused serious physical injury to the victim by shooting him with a deadly weapon (see, Penal Law § 120.05 [4]; People v Wright, 105 AD2d 1088). We have considered defendant’s remaining claims and find each one lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — assault, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

People v. Szadek, 143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

143 A.D.2d 505 (People v. Szadek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related