People v. Syreck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Syreck

8 A.D.2d 835, 190 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8176

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 835 (People v. Syreck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Syreck, 8 A.D.2d 835, 190 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from a judgment of conviction of the County Court, Kings County, rendered May 5, 1958 sentencing appellant, after he had been found guilty by a jury of grand larceny in the first degree, to serve from 15 years to life as a fourth felony offender, and (2) from each and every intermediate order or ruling therein made including an order denying his motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders or rulings which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from a judgment of conviction of the County Court, Kings County, rendered May 5, 1958 sentencing appellant, after he had been found guilty by a jury of grand larceny in the first degree, to serve from 15 years to life as a fourth felony offender, and (2) from each and every intermediate order or ruling therein made including an order denying his motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders or rulings which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 835, 190 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-syreck-nyappdiv-1959.