People v. Sydoriak
Opinion
[1017]*1017OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court, for reasons stated in People v Nealon (26 NY3d 152 [2015] [decided herewith]).
Chief Judge Lippman (dissenting). I dissent, and would affirm the order of the Appellate Division for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in People v Nealon (26 NY3d 152 [2015] [decided herewith]).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
42 N.E.3d 212 (People v. Sydoriak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.