People v. Swift

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Swift

305 A.D.2d 280, 758 N.Y.S.2d 807, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5847

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 280 (People v. Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Swift, 305 A.D.2d 280, 758 N.Y.S.2d 807, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered May 2, 2000, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of IV2 to 4V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of her right to appeal (see People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909 [1990]). Accordingly, this waiver precludes any interest of justice review by this Court of her excessive sentence claim (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did [281]*281not validly waive her right to appeal, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered May 2, 2000, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of IV2 to 4V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of her right to appeal (see People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909 [1990]). Accordingly, this waiver precludes any interest of justice review by this Court of her excessive sentence claim (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did [281]*281not validly waive her right to appeal, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 280, 758 N.Y.S.2d 807, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-swift-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack