People v. Swanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Swanson

283 A.D.2d 526, 724 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 526 (People v. Swanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Swanson, 283 A.D.2d 526, 724 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), both rendered July 24, 2000, convicting him of menacing in the second degree under Indictment No. 226/2000 and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree under Superior Court Information No. 1387/2000, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J. P., Altman, McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), both rendered July 24, 2000, convicting him of menacing in the second degree under Indictment No. 226/2000 and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree under Superior Court Information No. 1387/2000, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J. P., Altman, McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 526, 724 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-swanson-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack