People v. Sutton

175 N.Y.S.3d 900, 2022 NY Slip Op 06149
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 2022
Docket2020-02186
StatusPublished

This text of 175 N.Y.S.3d 900 (People v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sutton, 175 N.Y.S.3d 900, 2022 NY Slip Op 06149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Sutton (2022 NY Slip Op 06149)
People v Sutton
2022 NY Slip Op 06149
Decided on November 2, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 2, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

2020-02186

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Antonio Sutton, appellant.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant.

Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Karla Lato of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Chris Ann Kelley, J.), dated February 10, 2020, which, after a hearing, designated him a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court's designation of the defendant as a level one sexually violent offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n[3]; People v Smith, 103 AD3d 616, 616). The defendant was properly designated a sexually violent offender based upon his conviction of a sex offense in North Carolina (see Correction Law § 168-a[3]; People v Uver A., 195 AD3d 61, 63; People v Terry, 177 AD3d 494, 494; People v Alvarez, 166 AD3d 570, 570; People v Maldonado, 147 AD3d 798, 799; People v Lopez, 146 AD3d 477, 477; People v Smith, 103 AD3d at 616).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
2017 NY Slip Op 107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Maldonado
2017 NY Slip Op 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Smith
103 A.D.3d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 N.Y.S.3d 900, 2022 NY Slip Op 06149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sutton-nyappdiv-2022.