People v. Sutton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sutton

191 A.D.2d 599, 595 N.Y.S.2d 693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 A.D.2d 599 (People v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sutton, 191 A.D.2d 599, 595 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings [600]*600County (Lipp, J.), rendered June 21, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By decision and order of this Court dated June 22, 1991, the defendant’s appeal was dismissed (see, People v Sutton, 175 AD2d 272). By order dated October 27, 1992, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision and order of this Court and remitted the matter to this Court for review of the defendant’s argument that the indictment should be dismissed on constitutional speedy trial grounds (see, People v Sutton, 80 NY2d 273). Justice Lawrence has been substituted for former Justice Harwood (22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, e.g., People v Johnson, 184 AD2d 862; People v Thorpe, 183 AD2d 795; People v Conrad, 176 AD2d 750; People v Mullins, 137 AD2d 227). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings [600]*600County (Lipp, J.), rendered June 21, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By decision and order of this Court dated June 22, 1991, the defendant’s appeal was dismissed (see, People v Sutton, 175 AD2d 272). By order dated October 27, 1992, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision and order of this Court and remitted the matter to this Court for review of the defendant’s argument that the indictment should be dismissed on constitutional speedy trial grounds (see, People v Sutton, 80 NY2d 273). Justice Lawrence has been substituted for former Justice Harwood (22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, e.g., People v Johnson, 184 AD2d 862; People v Thorpe, 183 AD2d 795; People v Conrad, 176 AD2d 750; People v Mullins, 137 AD2d 227). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 599, 595 N.Y.S.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sutton-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack