People v. Sutliff

168 A.D.2d 745, 565 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15251
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sutliff. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D.2d 1033

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), ren[746]*746dered December 11, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

The People concede that defendant was not adequately informed of his right to challenge any statement regarding a predicate felony conviction as required by CPL 400.21. Due to this failure to comply with the statutory procedures for determining second felony offender status, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted for resentencing (see, People v Snyder, 105 AD2d 553).

Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sutliff, 168 A.D.2d 745, 565 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

168 A.D.2d 745 (People v. Sutliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Snyder
105 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)