People v. Susmarski

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Susmarski

210 Ill. App. 233, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 208

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 16, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,379·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Criminal law, § 156a*—when not error to admit confession of one defendant in prosecution for conspiracy. It is not error, in a prosecution against several defendants for criminal conspiracy, to admit in evidence a confession made by one of such defendants not i,i the presence of others, to the admission of which only a general objection is made by such others, where the confession is such that no part thereof can be excluded and leave in intelligible form so much of it as is unquestionably admissible against the defendant making it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Criminal law, § 156a*—when not error to admit confession of one defendant in prosecution for conspiracy. It is not error, in a prosecution against several defendants for criminal conspiracy, to admit in evidence a confession made by one of such defendants not i,i the presence of others, to the admission of which only a general objection is made by such others, where the confession is such that no part thereof can be excluded and leave in intelligible form so much of it as is unquestionably admissible against the defendant making it.

People v. Susmarski, 210 Ill. App. 233, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 208 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

210 Ill. App. 233 (People v. Susmarski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related