People v. Susankar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Susankar

52 A.D.3d 322, 858 N.Y.S.2d 607

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 322 (People v. Susankar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Susankar, 52 A.D.3d 322, 858 N.Y.S.2d 607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered January 12, 2007, resentencing defendant upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and reckless endangerment in the first degree, to an aggregate term of 26 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of directing that all sentences be served concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive. The above reduction results in an aggregate term of 22 years to life, equal to the term imposed on the murder conviction. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered January 12, 2007, resentencing defendant upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and reckless endangerment in the first degree, to an aggregate term of 26 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of directing that all sentences be served concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive. The above reduction results in an aggregate term of 22 years to life, equal to the term imposed on the murder conviction. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.3d 322, 858 N.Y.S.2d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-susankar-nyappdiv-2008.