People v. Superior Court

27 P.2d 670, 135 Cal. App. 562, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 257
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 5, 1933·No. Docket No. 9346.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

In an action against one Oliver, the defendant was convicted of attempted grand theft, with two prior convictions of other offenses. Respondent court sentenced Oliver to a term of one year in the county jail. It is the contention of the district attorney that under the circumstances of the case, the court was without authority to impose a misdemeanor sentence, and that the punishment required to be imposed is by way of sentence to a term in the state prison.

[1] Apparently the respondent has been convinced that it was in error, for we have presented to us a stipulation that the peremptory writ of mandate may issue. On examination of the authorities — particularly referring to Penal Code, sections 489 and 664, and People v. Superior Court, 116 Cal.App. 412 [2 P.2d 843], and Ex parte Hope, 59 Cal. 423 — we are satisfied that this court should approve the stipulation thus made.

Let the peremptory writ issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Superior Court, 27 P.2d 670, 135 Cal. App. 562, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 257 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

27 P.2d 670 (People v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Superior Court (Duran)
84 Cal. App. 3d 480 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
People v. Cabral
51 Cal. App. 3d 707 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
People v. Bell
17 Cal. App. 3d 949 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
People v. Massengale
10 Cal. App. 3d 689 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
People v. Phillips
173 P.2d 392 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)