People v. Sumpter

2018 NY Slip Op 5704

Opinion

People v Sumpter (2018 NY Slip Op 05704)

People v Sumpter

2018 NY Slip Op 05704

Decided on August 8, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 8, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-05463

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Danzel Sumpter, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 420/17)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Alice R. B. Cullina of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Christopher J. Blira- Koessler of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephanie Zaro, J.), imposed March 28, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., ROMAN, COHEN, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court