People v. Sultan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sultan

258 A.D.2d 639, 682 N.Y.S.2d 906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D.2d 639 (People v. Sultan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sultan, 258 A.D.2d 639, 682 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered August 15, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s allegations of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, they are without merit (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v Ferrer, 245 AD2d 569).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or do not require reversal. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered August 15, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s allegations of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, they are without merit (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v Ferrer, 245 AD2d 569).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or do not require reversal. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D.2d 639, 682 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sultan-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack