People v. Sullivan

2018 NY Slip Op 8043
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2018
Docket2016-12486
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 8043 (People v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sullivan, 2018 NY Slip Op 8043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Sullivan (2018 NY Slip Op 08043)
People v Sullivan
2018 NY Slip Op 08043
Decided on November 21, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 21, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-12486
2016-12670

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Vincent Sullivan, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 9181/15, 8635/16)


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Frederick Arriaga, J.), both imposed November 18, 2016, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; cf. People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146). The defendant's valid waivers of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).

BALKIN, J.P., SGROI, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 8043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-2018.