People v. Sullivan

46 A.D.3d 285, 847 N.Y.S.2d 516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sullivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 A.D.3d 882

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), entered on or about November 2, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly accepted the Board of Examiners’ recommendation of a discretionary upward departure (see e.g. People v Roland, 292 AD2d 271 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 614 [2002]), based on aggravating factors that were established by clear and convincing evidence and were not adequately taken into account by the Board’s risk assessment instrument. The egregious conduct toward a child that resulted in defendant’s underlying conviction, along with the circumstances surrounding that crime, demonstrate that defendant poses a grave danger to children. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sullivan, 46 A.D.3d 285, 847 N.Y.S.2d 516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 285 (People v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Roland
292 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)