People v. Sullivan

148 A.D.2d 995, 538 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2663
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1989·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, after a joint trial with three codefendants, on eight counts of a nine-count indictment arising out of an escape from the Livingston County jail. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in declining to charge the jury that it could find that Richard Trathen, the main People’s witness, was an accomplice and

[996]*996that, if Trathen was an accomplice, his testimony needed to be corroborated. We find no merit to this contention. The evidence at trial showed that Trathen had provided defendants with a map of the surrounding area before he became aware of defendants’ planned escape. On these facts, there is no reasonable view of the evidence to support a conclusion that Trathen was an accomplice of defendants (CPL 60.22; see, People v Tucker, 72 NY2d 849). We have examined defendant’s other contentions, and we find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Livingston County Court, Cicoria, J. —assault, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine, and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sullivan, 148 A.D.2d 995, 538 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

148 A.D.2d 995 (People v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Neiva
161 A.D.2d 1173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Lowery
155 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Kanaval
148 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)