People v. Sudhan
This text of 83 A.D.3d 874 (People v. Sudhan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J), rendered June 26, 2009, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (two counts), and conspiracy in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the accomplice’s testimony was sufficiently corroborated (see CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Reome, 15 NY3d 188, 194 [2010]; People v Cortez, 81 AD3d 742 [2011]).
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in its jury instruction for the conspiracy count is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.D.3d 874, 920 N.Y.S.2d 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sudhan-nyappdiv-2011.